In a standard suspicious package response, which statement best reflects the provided procedures?

• A. Location response, RDC notification, report characteristics, evacuation, backup request, perimeter establishment, communication cessation near device, and information gathering
• B. Do not respond and wait for instructions from higher authorities
• C. Wrap and deliver the package to the sender
• D. Notify only the on-site supervisor and do nothing else

Answer: (A)

The main idea being tested is that a suspicious-package response must follow a structured, safety-first sequence that quickly establishes control, alerts the right people, and gathers essential information to guide actions.

The best choice reflects that exact approach: it starts with locating and securing the area, then notifying the right authority (RDC), followed by documenting key details about the package (report characteristics). It then moves to protecting people by evacuating the area, setting up a perimeter, and limiting communications near the potential device to reduce risk. After that, it requests backup to manage the scene and ensure adequate resources, and finally collects information from witnesses and the scene to support decision-making and evidence preservation.

This sequence ensures immediate safety and orderly management of the incident, rather than delaying action or bypassing necessary steps. Other options fail because they skip critical actions or delay response: waiting for higher authority instructions before acting can put people at risk; wrapping and delivering the package bypasses safety protocols; and notifying only one person and doing nothing else neglects essential containment, coordination, and information gathering.